I am not an expert in the 4 ‘Vedas’ solely… so I will not get in to whether the Vedas actually do or do not have such a mention.

The conclusion given on Krishna is as per the knowledge given in Bhagavad Gita and Bhagavatam and several of the smriti shastras.

What we can be sure of is if one takes the conclusion of either of Shruti or Smriti shastras and rejects the other, that itself is against the conclusion of the Vedas.

But I would like to know one thing. When you say you ‘learnt’ that Krishna is never mentioned in Vedas, may I ask where or from who did you learn it?

I went through all your article. Quiet impressive. I have studied a bit about Hinduism during my study days. My question is you mentioned Krishna is the true form of God and you also mentioned about the authority of Vedas but I learnt that the Krishna is never mentioned in Vedas. Isn’t it contradictory?

Please don’t call me ‘sir’ and such. I am not that old… going by your photo on your blog, I am probably around the same age group as you.

Nor am I a ‘pundit’ as you have mentioned. I just got an early start on the spiritual path while I was studying engineering. And whatever little I know is by the mercy of my teachers and I have a very, very long way to go to internalize the full import of their teachings.

We are brainwashed everyday by the colorful but misleading proponents of ‘modern’ lifestyle and this is causing more damage than good to us, both physically and mentally.

So all I am trying to do here is get people to understand what a wealth of knowledge and means for purposeful, peaceful existence they are missing on by ignoring our ancient legacy.

Again, I implore you (and everyone reading this comment) to please give just one honest, sincere reading of the books I have linked to.

Yeah….. i wanted to explain whatever the little stuff i had known..

But as you said i may miss the comprehensiveness and the holistic aspect of my questioning…

I will definitely come back to you once i reach the platform to question you.
BTW, what can starters like me can explain the Dvaithic/Advaithic pundits like you. I mean it sir. I assure you that am not sarcastic here.

Please do continue your noble work of enlightening us. Thanks again

I am not sarcastic here….
I thought it is better to learn some basics at least before i raise some doubts…
I will try to read those books…..
Thanks again

“May I know why do you feel that God and Science are poles apart.?”

Where did I say that?

When said that God is the cause for everything, it means ‘science’ as it is in nature. We are merely discovering aspects of science as of now.

The only problem is the modern day scientists and their ‘theories’. For all the claims of scientific advancement and such, I am pretty sure that no scientist would be capable of showing the actual proof of life being created from matter or stop aging, disease and death.

But they would also not submit themselves to the process by which they can understand the workings of nature or God from a different dimension.

For all practical reasons, ‘modern science’ is sort of a ‘religion’ with its own high priests, dedicated books, initiates and rituals.

You still haven’t explained the statement you made:

““4.Advaitam and Vishishtadvaitam –> They both clearly demonstrate the life functioning and compatibility of energy and matter in scientific way.””

I was born in a family that is staunchly advaitic. I was a follower of advaita too until about 10 years ago but I follow Dvaita philosophy by the effect of knowledge I have received.

So, I would very much like to see how you substantiate your theory, especially when you make a claim that you do not subscribe to the entirety of Vedas and irrational myths of puranas… which are the basis for both siddhantas you have mentioned.

Read the books that I have linked to. I have read the very same books when I started on this path. They answer every single question you have asked and much more.

Thanks for your interaction. If not for anything else, I am pretty sure that at least some will be benefited from this whole discussion.